CAPA software

CAPA Software for Corrective and Preventive Action

Most corrective actions correct a part. A CAPA that works corrects the reason the part was made that way — and then checks that it did.

Already have an account? Login

The problem

The two failures of a CAPA system are closing early and closing narrow.

Closing early means marking an action complete because the task was done, without evidence the problem stopped. Effectiveness verification exists precisely to make that impossible, and it is the step most often skipped when the CAPA lives in a spreadsheet with a status column.

Closing narrow means fixing one part number when the same process makes eleven. Read-across is the question "where else does this apply?" asked while the investigation is still open, rather than a year later when it happens on a different line.

Containment before cause

What is protecting the customer now is recorded first, and separately from the permanent fix.

Root cause, structured

Five-why and fishbone as data, so the reasoning can be reviewed rather than admired.

Corrective and preventive, kept apart

Correcting this occurrence and preventing recurrence are different actions with different owners.

Effectiveness verified

A CAPA cannot be closed on assertion — the check is a step with its own evidence and date.

Read-across

Which other parts, processes and lines share the cause, asked as part of the investigation.

Systemic view

Repeat causes across CAPAs are visible, which is how a pattern stops being eight separate incidents.

Where it sits

A CAPA is only finished when the system changed.

Raised from a nonconformance, an audit finding or a complaint; closed into a changed FMEA, a changed control plan or changed training. The last link is what makes it preventive.

  • Containment recorded separately from the fix
  • Five-why and fishbone as structured data
  • Corrective and preventive actions tracked apart
  • Effectiveness verification required before closure
  • Read-across to similar parts and processes
  • Repeat-cause visibility across CAPAs
FAQ

Questions about CAPA software

What is the difference between corrective and preventive action?
Corrective action addresses the occurrence that happened — the parts, the customer, the immediate cause. Preventive action changes the system so the same cause cannot produce the problem again. A CAPA with only the first half will be back.
What is effectiveness verification?
A deliberate check, after the action has been in place long enough to matter, that the problem has actually stopped. It has its own date and its own evidence, and a CAPA cannot be closed without it.
What is read-across?
Asking which other parts, processes, lines or plants share the same cause. It is the difference between fixing an instance and fixing a class, and it is asked during the investigation rather than after.
Can a CAPA come from an audit finding?
Yes. Nonconformances, customer complaints, audit findings and management review actions can all raise one, and the CAPA keeps its link back to whichever it was.
Get started

Close the cause, not the ticket.

Bring APQP, FMEA, PPAP, process flow, control plans, inspection and SPC into one connected platform.

Questions? support@easyqualityflow.com